The Effectiveness of School Principals in Managing School Operational Assistance (BOS) Funds
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61987/jemr.v4i1.1566Keywords:
School Management, Fund Management, Managerial EffectivenessAbstract
This study aims to analyze the effectiveness of school principals’ work in managing the School Operational Assistance (BOS) funds. A qualitative descriptive approach was employed. The participants included school principals, BOS treasurers, and BOS management teams. Data were collected through in-depth interviews, observation, and document analysis, with data validity ensured through source and technique triangulation. The results indicate that principals’ effectiveness in managing BOS funds is reflected in their managerial functions, including planning, budgeting, and financial supervision. Principals actively ensure timely fund management, despite facing administrative and technical challenges. Budget planning is conducted based on real school needs and prioritized collaboratively with the BOS management team. Program development and budget allocation follow systematic procedures aligned with technical guidelines, and financial calculations are carried out rationally within the permissible limits. The study concludes that principals’ managerial competence—coordinating planning, setting priorities, managing time, and allocating funds accountably—determines the effectiveness of BOS fund management. The findings imply that strengthening principals’ managerial capacity is essential for enhancing the efficiency and accountability of school fund management.
References
Andriyan, A., & Yoenanto, N. H. (2022). Optimalisasi penerapan dan pengelolaan manajemen berbasis sekolah : literatur review. Jurnal Akuntabilitas Manajemen Pendidikan, 10(1), 14–27. https://doi.org/10.21831/jamp.v10i1.45011
Arifin, N. (2025). Manajemen Pendidikan: Teori Dan Praktek. Penerbit Tahta Media.
Asrin, A. (2021). Manajemen Kepemimpinan Kepala Sekolah dan Kinerja Guru. CV. Azka Pustaka.
Bhangu, S., Provost, F., & Caduff, C. (2023). Introduction to qualitative research methods–Part I. Perspectives in clinical research, 14(1), 39-42. https://doi.org/10.4103/picr.picr_253_22
Devi, A. D., Islam, U., Sunan, N., & Yogyakarta, K. (2021). Implementasi Manajemen Berbasis Sekolah dalam Meningkatkan Kualitas di Sekolah Menengah Pertama. Edukatif : Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 3(3), 963–971. https://doi.org/10.31004/edukatif.v3i3.481
Heliani, Wahidin, D., & Susilawati, E. (2022). Analisis Transparansi dan Akuntabilitas Pengelolaan Dana Sekolah. Jurnal Aktiva : Riset Akuntansi Dan Keuangan, 2(2), 56–65. https://doi.org/10.52005/aktiva.v2i2.45
Ismail, Y. Z. (2023). Evaluasi Dan Pengendalian Peningkatan Mutu Dan Daya Saing Lembaga Pendidikan Islam. AL-IFKAR: Jurnal Pengembangan Ilmu Keislaman, 19(01), 4-29.
Kilag, O. K. T., Uy, F. T., Calledo, M. F. S., Cerna, Y. T. D., Villanueva, K. M., & Angtud, N. A. A. (2023). Quality performance of teachers: work environment, work attitude, and principal supervision: qualitative investigation. Science and Education, 4(7), 415-429. https://doi.org/10.11594/baerj.04.01.01
Li, J., Chan, P. W. K., & Hu, Y. (2023). The effects of principals’ instructional leadership on primary school students’ academic achievement in China: Evidence from serial multiple mediating analysis. Sustainability, 15(3), 2844. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15032844
Lutfiyah, P. A. A., & Khamidi, A. (2022). Peran Kepala Sekolah Dalam Menerapkan Kompetensi Manajerial Untuk Mendukung Pelaksanaan Pembelajaran Pasca Pandemi Covid-19. Jurnal Inspirasi Manajemen Pendidikan, 10(1), 45–48.
Matović, N., & Ovesni, K. (2023). Interaction of quantitative and qualitative methodology in mixed methods research: integration and/or combination. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 26(1), 51-65.
Muttaqin, I., Tursina, N., Sudrajat, A., Yuliza, U., Novianto, N., Ramadhan, F. F., & Kurnanto, M. E. (2023). The effect of academic supervision, managerial competence, and teacher empowerment on teacher performance: the mediating role of teacher commitment. F1000Research, 12, 743. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.128502.1
Nebieridze, K. (2023). Innovative school leadership aspects. Journal of Legal Studies “Vasile Goldiş”, 31(45), 17-37. https://doi.org/10.2478/jles-2023-0002
Okoko, J. M., Tunison, S., & Walker, K. D. (2023). Varieties of qualitative research methods. Saskatoon, Saskatoon: Springer Texts in Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-04394-9
Pilcher, N., & Cortazzi, M. (2024). 'Qualitative'and'quantitative'methods and approaches across subject fields: implications for research values, assumptions, and practices. Quality & Quantity, 58(3), 2357-2387. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-023-01734-4
Pregoner, J. D. (2024). Research approaches in education: A comparison of quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods. IMCC Journal of Science, 4(2), 31-36.
Sodikin, M., Anto, P., & Anwar, K. (2024). Enhancing education quality in Islamic institutions through management approaches. Evaluasi: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam, 8(1), 70-81. https://doi.org/10.32478/cwxxya26
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Siti Nurjannah, Risfa Tri Ulfa, Ngantori, Afriana Santosa

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.








