Exploring Speech Act Patterns in Lecturer–Student Online Interactions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61987/jemr.v5i3.1659Keywords:
Illocutionary Acts, Online Classroom, Speech ActsAbstract
This study aims to investigate the types of illocutionary speech acts most frequently produced by lecturers and students during online classroom interactions. Focusing on the illocutionary dimension, the study explores how language is used to convey intentions, requests, and social interactions in educational settings. A descriptive qualitative approach was employed, analyzing interactions based on Searle and Yule’s speech act theories. Data were collected from recorded online class sessions, transcribed, and systematically coded to identify patterns of speech acts. The findings indicate that directive acts are the most dominant, reflecting attempts by speakers to elicit actions from others. Assertive acts, which demonstrate the speaker’s authority and provide information, were the second most frequent. Expressive acts, conveying emotions, attitudes, or respect, appeared less frequently, while commissive acts, related to commitments to future actions, were the least observed. These results highlight the central role of directive and assertive speech in managing online classroom interactions and facilitating effective communication. The study suggests that awareness of speech act patterns can enhance teaching strategies, improve student engagement, and reduce miscommunication in online learning environments.
References
Almelhes, S. (2024). Enhancing Arabic Language Acquisition: Effective Strategies for Addressing Non-Native Learners' Challenges. Education Sciences, 14(10), 1116. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14101116
Bazen, A., Barg, F. K., & Takeshita, J. (2021). Research Techniques Made Simple: An Introduction to Qualitative Research. Journal of Investigative Dermatology, 141(2), 241-247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jid.2020.11.029
Blegur, J., Haq, A. H. B., & Barida, M. (2023). Assertiveness as a New Strategy for Physical Education Students to Maintain Academic Performance. The Qualitative Report, 28(3), 865-885. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2023.5659
Cheung, A. (2021). Synchronous Online Teaching, a Blessing or a Curse? Insights From EFL Primary Students' Interaction During Online English Lessons. System, 100, 102566. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102566
Dai, D. W. (2026). What Do Second Language Speakers Really Need for Real-World Interaction? A Needs Analysis of L2 Chinese Interactional Competence. Language Teaching Research, 30(2), 655-692. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688221144836
Darong, H. C. (2024, June). Teaching Speech Acts in EFL Context. In Frontiers in Education (Vol. 9, p. 1423498). Frontiers Media SA. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1423498
De León, L., & García-Sánchez, I. M. (2021). Language Socialization at the Intersection of the Local and the Global: The Contested Trajectories of Input and Communicative Competence. Annual Review of Linguistics, 7(1), 421-448. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-linguistics-011619-030538
Degen, J. (2023). The Rational Speech Act Framework. Annual Review of Linguistics, 9(1), 519-540. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-linguistics-031220-010811
Economidou-Kogetsidis, M. (2023). "The Language Is Very Formal and Appropriate": L2 Learners' In/Appropriateness Evaluations and Metapragmatic Judgments in Student-Faculty Emails. Journal of Pragmatics, 217, 17-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2023.09.001
Ferreira, V. A. (2021). The Construction of Future and Hypothetical Dialogues in Third-Party Complaints as Enactments of a Subsequent Direct Complaint. Journal of Pragmatics, 181, 68-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.05.014
Fryer, L. K., & Leenknecht, M. J. (2023). Toward an Organising Theoretical Model for Teacher Clarity, Feedback and Self-Efficacy in the Classroom. Educational Psychology Review, 35(3), 68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09787-5
Gweon, H. (2021). Inferential Social Learning: Cognitive Foundations of Human Social Learning and Teaching. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 25(10), 896-910. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2021.07.008
Khater, H. A., Altakhaineh, A. R. M., & Dahnous, F. (2024). Pragmatic Analysis of King Abdullah's Speech: Exploring Speech Acts and Societal Context. Cogent Arts & Humanities, 11(1), 2433879. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2024.2433879
Li, D., & Zhang, L. (2022). Exploring Teacher Scaffolding in a CLIL-Framed EFL Intensive Reading Class: A Classroom Discourse Analysis Approach. Language Teaching Research, 26(3), 333-360. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168820903340
Lim, W. M. (2025). What Is Qualitative Research? An Overview and Guidelines. Australasian Marketing Journal, 33(2), 199-229. https://doi.org/10.1177/14413582241264619
O'Dwyer, M., Filieri, R., & O'Malley, L. (2023). Establishing Successful University-Industry Collaborations: Barriers and Enablers Deconstructed. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 48(3), 900-931. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-022-09932-2
Pawlik, Ł., Płaza, M., Deniziak, S., & Boksa, E. (2022). A Method for Improving Bot Effectiveness by Recognising Implicit Customer Intent in Contact Centre Conversations. Speech Communication, 143, 33-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.specom.2022.07.003
Riwayatiningsih, R. (2025). Communication in the Classroom: Speech Acts, Managerial Modes, and Student Learning. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 46(3), 460327. https://doi.org/10.34044/j.kjss.2025.46.3.27
Shams, G., Kim, K. K., & Kim, K. (2024). Enhancing Service Recovery Satisfaction With Chatbots: The Role of Humor and Informal Language. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 120, 103782. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2024.103782
Shumanov, M., & Johnson, L. (2021). Making Conversations With Chatbots More Personalized. Computers in Human Behavior, 117, 106627. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106627
Suen, H. Y., & Hung, K. E. (2025). Enhancing Learner Affective Engagement: The Impact of Instructor Emotional Expressions and Vocal Charisma in Asynchronous Video-Based Online Learning. Education and Information Technologies, 30(3), 4033-4060. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12956-w
Wang, Y., & Liu, Q. (2020). Effects of Online Teaching Presence on Students' Interactions and Collaborative Knowledge Construction. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 36(3), 370-382. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12408
Whitehouse, M., Rahm, H., Wozniak, S., Breunig, S., De Nardi, G., Dionne, F., ... & Sviķe, S. (2021). Developing Shared Languages: The Fundamentals of Mutual Learning and Problem Solving in Transdisciplinary Collaboration. AILA Review, 34(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1075/aila.00038.int
Ydesen, C., & Dorn, S. (2022). The No Child Left Behind Act in the Global Architecture of Educational Accountability. History of Education Quarterly, 62(3), 268-290. https://doi.org/10.1017/heq.2022.11
Yi, R. (2026). Enhancing Sentiment Analysis and Error Prediction in Lawyer Questioning Through Legal NLP Models: A Mixed-Methods Study in Australian Courtrooms. Journal of Mixed Methods Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/15586898261429189
Zhang, H., Chen, S., & Zheng, S. (2025). Proactive Personality, Interaction, and Teaching Strategy Alignment: A Conceptual-Level Analysis of Interaction in Distance Learning. Education and Information Technologies, 30(2), 1873-1912. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12893-8
Zuo, M. (2025). Navigating for Positive Group Dynamics Through Emotion Regulation: A Multimodal Conversation Analysis on Teacher Discussions in Chinese EFL Curriculum Development. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-025-00971-5
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Nurfadilah, Muh. Hasbi, Aslan Abidin

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.








