Environmental, Social, and Governance Performance and Stock Investment Risk: The Distinct Role of the Environmental Dimension

Authors

  • Gilberth Haris Aditya Parhusip Universitas Tanjungpura
  • Wendy Universitas Tanjungpura
  • Anwar Azazi Universitas Tanjungpura
  • M. Ridwan Ristyawan Universitas Tanjungpura
  • Uray Ndaru Mustika Universitas Tanjungpura

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61987/jemr.v5i5.2849

Keywords:

ESG Performance, Stock Investment Risk, Market Capitalization

Abstract

This study aims to examine the effect of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) performance on stock investment risk and to investigate the moderating role of market capitalization in the relationship between ESG performance and stock investment risk. Panel data regression analysis was employed using the Common Effect Model (CEM), Fixed Effect Model (FEM), and Random Effect Model (REM). Model selection was conducted through the Chow, Hausman, and Lagrange Multiplier tests, with the Random Effect Model identified as the most appropriate estimation model. The findings reveal that overall ESG performance has no significant effect on stock investment risk. Likewise, the interaction between ESG performance and market capitalization does not significantly moderate the relationship. Further analysis of ESG dimensions shows that the Environmental dimension has a negative and statistically significant effect on stock investment risk at the 10% significance level, while the Social and Governance dimensions do not exhibit significant effects. These findings imply that aggregate ESG performance has not yet become a strong determinant of stock investment risk, although environmental performance may contribute to reducing investment risk. The results provide insights for investors and corporate managers regarding the importance of strengthening environmental practices as part of long-term risk management strategies.

References

Ahmad, H., Yaqub, M., & Lee, S. H. (2023). Environmental-, Social-, and Governance-Related Factors for Business Investment and Sustainability: A Scientometric Review of Global Trends. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-02921-x

Ainunnisa, D. A., Oktaviani, D., & Risman, A. (2024). The Effect of Risk Management on Profitability: Empirical Study of Banking Companies Listed in Indonesian Stock Exchange 2019-2023. Indikator: Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen Dan Bisnis, 8(3), 99. https://doi.org/10.22441/INDIKATOR.V8I3.28287

Baltagi, B. H. (2021). Econometric Analysis of Panel Data. Springer Texts in Business and Economics. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-53953-5

Cai, F. (2023). Analysis of ESG Factors in Financial Environment Risk and Investment Decision. Financial Engineering and Risk Management, 6(11), 162–167. https://doi.org/10.23977/FERM.2023.061124

Drempetic, S., Klein, C., & Zwergel, B. (2020). The Influence of Firm Size on the ESG Score: Corporate Sustainability Ratings Under Review. Journal of Business Ethics, 167(2), 333–360. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10551-019-04164-1

Feng, G., Long, H., Wang, H.-J., & Chang, C.-P. (2022). Environmental, Social and Governance, Corporate Social Responsibility, and Stock Returns: What Are the Short- and Long-Run Relationships? Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2334

Ferriani, F., & Natoli, F. (2021). ESG Risks in Times of Covid-19. Applied Economics Letters, 28(18), 1537–1541. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2020.1830932

Gao, J., Chu, D., Zheng, J., & Ye, T. (2022). Environmental, Social and Governance Performance: Can It Be a Stock Price Stabilizer? Journal of Cleaner Production. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134705

Janicka, M., & Sajnóg, A. (2022). The ESG Reporting of EU Public Companies—Does the Company’s Capitalisation Matter? Sustainability, 14(7), 4279. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU14074279

Kartikowati, R. S., Nurmalasari, D., Utari, E. D., Nida, R. R., Atmadja, F. S., Suhendry, B., & Riyantie, M. (2026). Transforming English Correspondence Learning Through Flipped Classroom-Based Materials. Indonesian Journal of Education and Social Studies, 5(1), 134–149.

Landi, G. C., Iandolo, F., Renzi, A., & Rey, A. (2022). Embedding Sustainability in Risk Management: The Impact of Environmental, Social, and Governance Ratings on Corporate Financial Risk. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 29(4), 1096–1107. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2256

Li, H., Zhang, X., & Zhao, Y. (2022). ESG and Firm’s Default Risk. Finance Research Letters, 47, 102713. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.FRL.2022.102713

Luo, W.-Q., Tian, Z., Fang, X., & Deng, M. (2023). Can Good ESG Performance Reduce Stock Price Crash Risk? Evidence from Chinese Listed Companies. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2646

Nirino, N., Battisti, E., Ferraris, A., Dell’Atti, S., & Briamonte, M. (2022). How and When Corporate Social Performance Reduces Firm Risk? The Moderating Role of Corporate Governance. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2296

Nurhayati, N. (2025). Sustainability Reporting, Corporate Governance, and Financial Performance: Analyzing the Role of ESG Factors in Investment Decisions. Journal of Hunan University Natural Sciences. https://doi.org/10.55463/issn.1674-2974.52.3.8

Oraby Salah Ahmed. (2025). The Impact of Environmental, Social, and Governance Performance on the Saudi Stock Exchange. Journal of Information Systems Engineering and Management. https://doi.org/10.52783/jisem.v10i52s.10792

Pacelli, V., Pampurini, F., & Quaranta, A. (2022). Environmental, Social and Governance Investing: Does Rating Matter? Business Strategy and the Environment. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3116

Parfitt, C. (2020). ESG Integration Treats Ethics as Risk, but Whose Ethics and Whose Risk? Responsible Investment in the Context of Precarity and Risk-Shifting. Critical Sociology, 46(4–5), 573–587. https://doi.org/10.1177/0896920519868794

Schanzenbach, M. M., & Sitkoff, R. H. (2020). ESG Investing: Theory, Evidence, and Fiduciary Principles. https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=3684979

Shakil, M. H. (2022). Environmental, Social and Governance Performance and Stock Price Volatility: A Moderating Role of Firm Size. Journal of Public Affairs, 22(3), e2574. https://doi.org/10.1002/PA.2574

Sherwood, M. W., Tasnia, M., Syed Jaafar AlHabshi, S. M., & Rosman, R. (2021). The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on Stock Price Volatility of the US Banks: A Moderating Role of Tax. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, 19(1), 77–91. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFRA-01-2020-0020

Singhania, M., & Gupta, D. (2024). Impact of Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) Disclosure on Firm Risk: A Meta-Analytical Review. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2725

Sulastri, S., Sipatu, L., Adam, R., & Kurniawan, A. (2025). Why Discipline and Happiness Matter in Boosting Government Employee Performance. Indonesian Journal of Education and Social Studies, 4(3), 348–359.

Tian, M., Li, S., Cao, X., & Wang, G. (2025). Network Analysis of Volatility Spillovers Between Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Rating Stocks: Evidence from China. Mathematics. https://doi.org/10.3390/math13101586

Yin, X., Li, J.-P., & Su, C.-W. (2023). How Does ESG Performance Affect Stock Returns? Empirical Evidence from Listed Companies in China. Heliyon, 9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16320

Zhao, Y., Elahi, E., Khalid, Z., Sun, X., & Sun, F. (2023). Environmental, Social and Governance Performance: Analysis of CEO Power and Corporate Risk. Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15021471

Downloads

Published

2026-07-30

How to Cite

Parhusip, G. H. A., Wendy, Azazi, A., Ristyawan, M. R., & Mustika, U. N. (2026). Environmental, Social, and Governance Performance and Stock Investment Risk: The Distinct Role of the Environmental Dimension . Journal of Educational Management Research, 5(5), 5320–5335. https://doi.org/10.61987/jemr.v5i5.2849

Issue

Section

Articles