Determinants of Continuance Intention Toward ChatGPT Premium Among Indonesian University Students: An Information Systems Success Model Perspective for Higher Education Management
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61987/jemr.v5i2.1892Keywords:
Generative Artificial Intelligence, Continuance Intention, Digital Learning ManagementAbstract
The rapid adoption of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) tools such as ChatGPT has significantly transformed digital learning practices in higher education; however, empirical evidence on students’ continuance intention toward subscription-based GenAI services remains limited. This study aims to examine the determinants of university students’ continuance intention to use ChatGPT Premium by adopting the Information Systems Success Model (ISSM) within the context of digital learning management. An online survey was conducted with 200 Indonesian university students who had used ChatGPT Premium for at least six months, and the data were analyzed using Partial Least Squares–Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). The results indicate that system quality, information quality, and service quality have positive and significant effects on perceived usefulness and price fairness, which subsequently enhance students’ continuance intention. Mediation analysis confirms that perceived usefulness and price fairness significantly mediate the relationships between the three quality dimensions and continuance intention. These findings extend the application of the ISSM by positioning price fairness as a critical evaluative component in subscription-based GenAI services and provide managerial implications for higher education institutions in optimizing digital learning strategies through improved system performance, information reliability, and value-oriented service management to support the sustainable use of GenAI in academic settings.
References
Adnin, I. (2024). Implications of ChatGPT implementation on students’ learning outcomes. Jurnal Ilmu Komputer & Pendidikan, 12(4), 211–224. https://ejournal.upi.edu/index.php/JIK/article/view/75634
Al-Abdullatif, A. M., & Alsubaie, M. A. (2024). ChatGPT in learning: Assessing students’ use intentions through the lens of perceived value and the influence of AI literacy. Behavioral Sciences, 14(9), 845. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14090845
Algoritma Editorial Team. (2025). Efektivitas peran ChatGPT sebagai alat bantu penyelesaian tugas akademik mahasiswa. Algoritma: Jurnal Teknik Informatika, 3(2), 83–94. https://journal.arimsi.or.id/index.php/Algoritma/article/download/445/608/2424
Bhattacherjee, A. (2001). Understanding information systems continuance: An expectation-confirmation model. MIS Quarterly, 25(3), 351–370. https://doi.org/10.2307/3250921
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived Usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://www.jstor.org/stable/249008
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation factors and self-determination in human behavior. Plenum. https://selfdeterminationtheory.org/SDT/documents/1985_DeciRyan_IMSD.pdf
DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (2003). The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: A ten-year update. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(4), 9–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2003.11045748
Fan, P., & Jiang, Q. (2024). Exploring the factors influencing Continuance Intention to use AI drawing tools: Insights from designers. Systems, 12(3), 68. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems12030068
Fitriati, A., Tubastuvi, N., Pratama, B. C., & Anggoro, S. (2020). Study of DeLone-McLean information system success model: The relationship between System Qualityand Information Quality. Journal of Applied Information Systems, 12(1), 1–7.
GoodStats. (2025, July 21). Benarkah mahasiswa RI ketagihan AI? https://goodstats.id/article/benarkah-mahasiswa-ri-ketagihan-ai-Y2Mf0
GoodStats. (2025, July 23). Capai 17,5 juta pengunjung, Indonesia masuk 5 besar negara pengakses ChatGPT. https://data.goodstats.id/statistic/capai-175-juta-pengunjung-indonesia-masuk-5-besar-negara-pengakses-chatgpt-A4q1v
Gunawan, A. (2023). Generation Z and price sensitivity: Dynamic pricing strategy as key to product attractiveness. Jurnal Ekonomi, 12(3), 145–158.
https://ejournal.seaninstitute.or.id/index.php/Ekonomi/article/download/7210/5470/19205
Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2021). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) third edition (3rd ed.).
Jeyaraj, A. (2020). DeLone & McLean models of information system success: A critical meta-review and research directions. International Journal of Information Management, 51, 102043. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.102043
Jurnalistika.id. (2025, July 23). Mahasiswa Indonesia tertinggi gunakan AI untuk belajar. https://www.jurnalistika.id/teknologi/mahasiswa-indonesia-tertinggi-gunakan-ai-untuk-belajar/
Jung, Y. M., & Jo, H. (2025). Understanding Continuance Intention of generative AI in education: An ECM-based study for sustainable learning engagement. Sustainability, 17(13), 6082. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17136082
Kim, J., Jhee, W., & Han, S. (2025). The impact of ChatGPT’s quality factors on Perceived Usefulness, perceived enjoyment, and continuous usage intention using the IS success model. Asia Marketing Journal, 26(1), 1–19. https://amj.kma.re.kr/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1641&context=journal
Lai, C. Y., Cheung, K. Y., & Chan, C. S. (2023). Exploring the role of intrinsic motivation factors in ChatGPT adoption to support active learning: An extension of the technology acceptance model. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 5, 100178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100178
Lee, H., & Kim, J. H. (2023). Effects of UTAUT on the digital literacy and acceptance intention of ChatGPT users. The Society of Convergence Knowledge Transactions, 11(2), 33–43. https://doi.org/10.22716/sckt.2023.11.2.014
Li, Y., Tan, C. H., & Teo, H. H. (2021). Evaluating the impact of information System Qualityon user’s Continuance Intention. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 713353. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.713353
Napitupulu, V., & Elfrida. (2025). Dampak fitur produk dan kesesuaian harga terhadap retensi pelanggan layanan digital kesehatan. Syntax Literate: Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia, 10(2), 1234–1248. https://doi.org/10.36418/syntax-literate.v10i11.62279
Nerdynav. (2025). ChatGPT statistics: Growth, usage, demographics & facts. https://nerdynav.com/chatgpt-statistic s/
OpenAI. (2024). College students and ChatGPT. OpenAI Global Affairs. https://openai.com/global-affairs/college-students-and-chatgpt/
Pratama, H., Sari, D. R., & Wulandari, N. (2025). Potential risks of ChatGPT-assisted essay writing on knowledge retention among EFL learners in Indonesia. Journal of Language Education Research, 12(2), 101–118. https://doi.org/10.52237/1j0f2165
Pratiwi, A., & Agustin, R. (2021). The influence of e-Service Quality, Price Fairness, and perceived ease of use on repurchase intention through customer satisfaction in online food delivery. Capital: Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis, 5(1), 22–35. https://capital.stiesemarang.ac.id/index.php/capital/article/download/208/100
PwC. (2024). Global Artificial Intelligence Study: Exploiting the AI revolution.
PYMNTS. (2025, January 16). Report: ChatGPT Plus has top retention rate among AI subscription services. https://www.pymnts.com/artificial-intelligence-2/2025/report-chatgpt-plus-has-top-retention-rate-among-ai-subscription-services/
Stanford HAI. (2025). The 2025 AI index report. https://hai.stanford.edu/ai-index/2025-ai-index-report
Suarmini, N., Suryani, N., & Sudiana, N. (2024). The DeLone and McLean information system success model: Investigating user satisfaction in learning management system. Jurnal Edutech Undiksha, 8(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.23887/jet.v8i1.71080
Supriyono, A., Lesmono, A. D., & Prihandono, T. (2024). Dampak dan tantangan pemanfaatan ChatGPT dalam pembelajaran pada Kurikulum Merdeka: Tinjauan literatur sistematis. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, 9(2), 144–162. https://jurnaldikbud.kemdikbud.go.id/index.php/jpnk/article/download/5214/663/
Susanto, P., Hoque, M. E., Nisaa, V., Islam, M. A., & Kamarulzaman, Y. (2023). Predicting m-commerce Continuance Intention and price sensitivity in Indonesia by integrating expectation-confirmation and post-acceptance model. SAGE Open, 13(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231188019
Susilowati, I. (2025). E-satisfaction sebagai mediasi pengaruh kualitas layanan dan kualitas sistem terhadap Continuance Intention. Juremi: Jurnal Riset Ekonomi, 4(4), 923–934. https://bajangjournal.com/index.php/Juremi/article/view/9442
Syarifudin, M., Yulianto, E., & Nugroho, A. (2025). Modeling AI-chatbot Service Qualityand purchase intention: Mediating mechanisms and the moderating role of intrusiveness. Journal of Digital Marketing and Halal Industry, 6(2), 211–240. https://doi.org/10.21580/jdmhi.2024.6.2.27893
Wahdah, R., Rahardjo, A., Nugroho, F., & Prasetya, D. (2025). Adoption of ChatGPT in higher education: Insights from the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology model. International Journal of Learning and Educational Advancement, 7(1), 45–62. https://journals2.ums.ac.id/index.php/ijolae/article/view/9743
Wijayanti, E., & Putra, H. (2021). Service Qualitymediates product quality and Price Fairness in customer satisfaction. Solusi: Jurnal Ilmiah, 19(3), 245–260. https://journals.usm.ac.id/index.php/solusi/article/view/11553
Wolf, V., & Maier, C. (2024). ChatGPT usage in everyday life: A motivation-theoretic mixed-methods study. International Journal of Information Management, 79, 102821. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2024.102821
Yu, X., Yang, Y., & Li, S. (2024). Users’ Continuance Intention towards an AI painting application: An extended expectation confirmation model. PLOS ONE, 19(5), e0301821. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0301821
Zamir, Z., & Kim, D. (2022). The effect of quality dimensions of information systems on knowledge sharing and user satisfaction. International Journal of Educational Knowledge, 10(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.37335/ijek.v10i1.153
Zizka, L. (2025). “It looks good enough”: Recognizing the quality of generative AI output in academic writing tasks in higher education. Journal of Information Technology & Education, 34(2), 178–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/10963758.2025.2496663
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Amaninda Jihan Nabila, Wenny Pebrianti, Giriati, Heriyadi, Harry Setiawan

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.








