From Sale to Agency: Reconceptualizing Informal Tobacco Contracts in Islamic Commercial Jurisprudence

Shofil Widad; Suliyanto Suliyanto

doi:10.61987/fiqh.v1i2.1323

Authors

Shofil Widad Ma'had Aly Nurul Jadid
Suliyanto Suliyanto Ma'had Aly Nurul Jadid

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61987/fiqh.v1i2.1323

Keywords:

Fiqh Muamalah, Maqasid Al-Shariah, Tobacco Trade, Middlemen, Islamic Commercial Law

Abstract

This study aims to analyze bulk tobacco trading practices from the perspective of fiqh muamalah and maqasid al-shariah. Tobacco trading is a primary source of livelihood for rural farmers, yet the system is largely controlled by middlemen who dominate price determination and weighing. This condition raises concerns regarding transparency, bargaining inequality, and compliance with Islamic commercial ethics. This research employs a qualitative empirical approach. Data were collected through observation and semi-structured interviews with farmers and intermediaries and analyzed using the Miles and Huberman interactive model supported by classical and contemporary fiqh literature. The findings reveal that tobacco transactions rely on informal verbal agreements supported by long-term social trust, while intermediaries largely control price determination and quality assessment through subjective evaluation. Unilateral weight deductions and delayed price disclosure create potential elements of gharar and weaken mutual consent. Two transaction models were identified: one with prior price agreement fulfilling the requirements of bay‘, and another with delayed price determination that may be reinterpreted as wakalah bil ujrah if compensation mechanisms are transparent. This study contributes to strengthening the application of maqasid al-shariah in rural market analysis and recommends transparent pricing, standardized weighing systems, and clearer contractual structures.

References

Abboud, M. (2025). Flourish or Perish: Managing a State-Owned Tobacco Monopoly in Times of Crisis. In Moral Farming of Immoral Tobacco: The Shia Community, The Tobacco Market, and the Future of Lebanon (pp. 179–413). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-97423-6_3

Albar, K., Abubakar, A., & Arsyad, A. (2023). Islamic Business Ethics in Online Commerce: A Perspective from Maqashid Shariah by Imam Haramain. Jurnal Islam Nusantara, 7(2), 273. https://doi.org/10.33852/jurnalnu.v7i2.501

Anam, K., Asmaie, E., Basir, A., Yahaya, & Zaini, M. (2022). Analysis of Rationalization through Restructuring of Islamic Finance based on the Ihsan Principle. Islamiyyat, 44(1), 41–51. https://doi.org/10.17576/islamiyyat-2022-4401-4

Aydın, S. Ö., & Argan, M. (2021). Understanding How Gamification Influences Consumers’ Dietary Preferences. Journal of Social Marketing, 11(2), 82–123. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSOCM-09-2019-0137

Bartley, T. (2022). Power and the Practice of Transnational Private Regulation. New Political Economy, 27(2), 188–202. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2021.1881471

Darmawan, D. (2024). The Failure Mode and Effect Analysis of Islamic Banking Product Marketing in Indonesia. Journal of Islamic Marketing. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIMA-08-2023-0268

Ezer, F., & Aksüt, S. (2021). Opinions of Graduate Students of Social Studies Education about Qualitative Research Method. International Education Studies, 14(3), 15–32.

Fan, M., Yang, P., & Li, Q. (2022). Impact of environmental regulation on green total factor productivity: a new perspective of green technological innovation. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(35), 53785–53800. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-19576-2

Fikri, M. (2025). Legal Analysis of The Supreme Court Decision Number 2319 K/PID, SUS/2024 Concerning Fiduciary Guarantees in Muamalah Fiqh. JURISTA: Jurnal Hukum dan Keadilan, 9(1), 109–130.

Fithriah, N., Arso, D. D., & Muthia, A. A. (2023). Implementing Accessibility Principles in Alternative Dispute Resolution for Sharia Economic Disputes in Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmiah Mizani, 10(2), 292–301. https://doi.org/10.29300/mzn.v10i2.3010

Furidha, B. W. (2024). Comprehension of the Descriptive Qualitative Research Method: a Critical Assessment of the Literature. Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.56943/jmr.v2i4.443

Gorbachuk, V., Gavrilenko, S., Lupei, M., Nikolenko, D., Pustovoit, M., & Batih, L. (2022). Asymmetric Information, Intermediation, Coordination, Rational Self-selection and Social Welfare. International Scientific Technical Journal “Problems of Control and Informatics,” 67(3), 151–160. https://doi.org/10.34229/2786-6505-2022-3-12

Haryadi, & Dedy Sumardi. (2025). Analysis of Unilateral Price Standard in the Palm Oil Trading System Reviewed From an Islamic Law Perspective. JURISTA: Jurnal Hukum Dan Keadilan, 9(2), 665–684. https://doi.org/10.22373/jurista.v9i2.294

Hasan, J., Sarib, S., Jan, R. H., & Harun, N. (2025). Pseudo-Consent in Indonesian Digital Commerce: Reframing Hurriyah at-Ta’aqud through Maqasid Systems Analysis. Kawanua International Journal of Multicultural Studies, 6(2), 262–278.

Helmi, M., & Umar, M. N. (2025). Implementing the Theory of Tsaman in Rubber’S Pricing Standard in Indra Makmur District, Aceh Province, Indonesia. JURISTA: Jurnal Hukum Dan Keadilan, 9(1), 318–336. https://doi.org/10.22373/jurista.v9i1.259

Kalimullina, M., & Orlov, M. (Shamil). (2020). Islamic Finance and Food Commodity Trading: Is There a Chance to Hedge Against Price Volatility and Enhance Food Security? Heliyon, 6(11), e05355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05355

Kumar, V., & Chandel, K. (2025). Transparency and Trust: A Study of Pricing Mechanisms and Bargaining Power in Horticulture Value Chains. IUP Journal of Supply Chain Management, 22(3), 31–59. https://doi.org/10.71329/IUPJSCM/2025.22.3.31-59

Lazar, S. (2025). Governing the Algorithmic City. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 53(2), 102–168. https://doi.org/10.1111/papa.12279

Mirza, H., Bellalem, F., & Mirza, C. (2023). Ethical Considerations in Qualitative Research: Summary Guidelines for Novice Social Science Researchers. Social Studies and Research Journal, 11(01), 441–449.

Nazzaro, C., Uliano, A., & Marotta, G. (2021). Drivers and Barriers Towards Social Farming: A Systematic Review. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(24), 14008. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132414008

Norton, G. W., Alwang, J., & Masters, W. A. (2021). Economics of Agricultural Development: World Food Systems and Resource Use. In Economics of Agricultural Development: World Food Systems and Resource Use. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429316999

Rahman, M. E., SY, T. R., Refliandi, I., & Fuadi, M. Y. (2024). Analysis of Overpayment Practices in Arisan with the Principles of Sharia Economic Law. Hakamain: Journal of Sharia and Law Studies, 3(1), 48–58.

Said, T. S., Ramli, H., & Damia Natasha, A. (2023). The Adaptation of Malay Philosophy Values through Maritime education Preservation and Conservation Wisdom. In BIO Web of Conferences (Vol. 79). https://doi.org/10.1051/bioconf/20237906001

Sgroi, F. (2022). Evaluating of The Sustainability of Complex Rural Ecosystems During The Transition from Agricultural Villages to Tourist Destinations and Modern Agri-Food Systems. Journal of Agriculture and Food Research, 9, 100330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafr.2022.100330

Tayyabi, A., & Shabbir, M. (2025). Fiqh al-Muʿāmalāt: Synthesizing Qur’ānic Principles (Qawāʿid Qurʾāniyyah), Classical Juristic Discourse, and Modern Socio-Economic Praxis. Tanazur, 6(1), 1–16.

Teh, T. H., & Wright, J. (2022). Intermediation and Steering: Competition in Prices and Commissions. American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 14(2), 281–321. https://doi.org/10.1257/mic.20190344

Yin, K., Liu, L., & Gu, H. (2022). Green Paradox or Forced Emission Reduction—The Dual Effects of Environmental Regulation on Carbon Emissions. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(17), 11058. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191711058