Fostering Grade 3 Students' Reading Interest: The One Day One Reading Literacy Movement

Authors

  • Faizatul Widat Universitas Nurul Jadid, Indonesia
  • Uswatun Hasanah Universitas Nurul Jadid, Indonesia
  • Arini Izzatin Nabila Universitas Nurul Jadid, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61987/educazione.v1i1.495

Keywords:

Literacy Movement, One Day One Reading, Interest in Reading

Abstract

This study examines the application of the One Day One Reading (ODOR) method in increasing the reading interest of grade 3 students at MI Azzainiyah II Karanganyar. The primary focus of this study is to explore the impact of daily reading activities carried out before lessons start, as well as the challenges faced while applying this method. This study uses a qualitative approach with a case study type, data collected through interviews, class observations, and documentation analysis. The findings of the study show that although ODOR has succeeded in increasing students' interest in reading, time constraints and book diversity are important factors that affect the program's success. In addition, home environment support, such as the role of parents in accompanying reading activities, has also been proven to increase the success of ODOR. The implications of these findings provide important insights for developing more flexible and effective literacy programs at the elementary school level and improving understanding of the factors that influence students' reading habits.

References

Affandi Arianto, M., Saukah, A., Basthomi, Y., & Wulyani, A. N. (2021). Previous Studies Have Several Limitations: Indonesian Doctoral Students’, Indonesian Academics’, and International Authors’ Research Gap Strategies in ELT Research Article Abstracts and Introductions. Journal of Language and Education, 7(2), 25–44. https://doi.org/10.17323/JLE.2021.11735

Agasisti, T., Avvisati, F., Borgonovi, F., & Longobardi, S. (2021). What School Factors Are Associated with the Success of Socio-Economically Disadvantaged Students? An Empirical Investigation Using PISA Data. Social Indicators Research, 157(2), 749–781. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-021-02668-w

Ali, Z., Palpanadan, S. T., Asad, M. M., Churi, P., & Namaziandost, E. (2022). Reading Approaches Practiced in EFL Classrooms: A Narrative Review and Research Agenda. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 7(1), 28. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-022-00155-4

Bingham, A. J. (2023). From Data Management to Actionable Findings: A Five-Phase Process of Qualitative Data Analysis. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 22, 16094069231183620. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069231183620

Buys, T., Casteleijn, D., Heyns, T., & Untiedt, H. (2022). A Reflexive Lens on Preparing and Conducting Semi-Structured Interviews with Academic Colleagues. Qualitative Health Research, 32(13), 2030–2039. https://doi.org/10.1177/10497323221130832

Chanifah, N., Hanafi, Y., Mahfud, C., & Samsudin, A. (2021). Designing a Spirituality-Based Islamic Education Framework for Young Muslim Generations: A Case Study from Two Indonesian Universities. Higher Education Pedagogies, 6(1), 195–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/23752696.2021.1960879

Chu, S.-Y., & Jhuo, R.-A. (2023). Family Support: Implementing Embedded Learning Opportunities Within Family Routines. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 35(5), 807–833.

Duke, N. K., Ward, A. E., & Pearson, P. D. (2021). The Science of Reading Comprehension Instruction. Reading Teacher, 74(6), 663–672. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1993

Farquhar, J., Michels, N., & Robson, J. (2020). Triangulation in Industrial Qualitative Case Study Research: Widening the Scope. Industrial Marketing Management, 87, 160–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2020.02.001

Heppt, B., Olczyk, M., & Volodina, A. (2022). Number of Books at Home as an Indicator of Socioeconomic Status: Examining Its Extensions and Their Incremental Validity for Academic Achievement. Social Psychology of Education, 25(4), 903–928. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-022-09704-8

Kim, J. S., Burkhauser, M. A., Mesite, L. M., Asher, C. A., Relyea, J. E., Fitzgerald, J., & Elmore, J. (2021). Improving Reading Comprehension, Science Domain Knowledge, and Reading Engagement through a First-Grade Content Literacy Intervention. Journal of Educational Psychology, 113(1), 3–26. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000465

Levy, B. L. M., Oliveira, A. W., & Harris, C. B. (2021). The Potential of “Civic Science Education”: Theory, Research, Practice, and Uncertainties. Science Education, 105(6), 1053–1075. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21678

Li, H., Majumdar, R., Chen, M. R. A., & Ogata, H. (2021). Goal-Oriented Active Learning (GOAL) System to Promote Reading Engagement, Self-Directed Learning Behavior, and Motivation in Extensive Reading. Computers and Education, 171, 104239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104239

Locher, F., & Pfost, M. (2020). The Relation Between Time Spent Reading and Reading Comprehension Throughout the Life Course. Journal of Research in Reading, 43(1), 57–77. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12289

Ludewig, U., Kleinkorres, R., Schaufelberger, R., Schlitter, T., Lorenz, R., König, C., Frey, A., & McElvany, N. (2022). COVID-19 Pandemic and Student Reading Achievement: Findings From a School Panel Study. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 876485. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.876485

Marougkas, A., Troussas, C., Krouska, A., & Sgouropoulou, C. (2023). Virtual Reality in Education: A Review of Learning Theories, Approaches and Methodologies for the Last Decade. Electronics (Switzerland), 12(13), 2832. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics12132832

McKenna, J. W., Adamson, R., & Solis, M. (2021). Reading Instruction for Students with Emotional Disturbance: A Mixed-Methods Investigation. Behavior Modification, 45(3), 399–437. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145445519868804

Morgan, D. L., & Nica, A. (2020). Iterative Thematic Inquiry: A New Method for Analyzing Qualitative Data. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 19, 1609406920955118. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406920955118

Naeem, M., Ozuem, W., Howell, K., & Ranfagni, S. (2023). A Step-by-Step Process of Thematic Analysis to Develop a Conceptual Model in Qualitative Research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 22, 16094069231205788. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069231205789

Priya, A. (2021). Case Study Methodology of Qualitative Research: Key Attributes and Navigating the Conundrums in Its Application. Sociological Bulletin, 70(1), 94–110. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038022920970318

Rachmaningtyas, N. A., Kartowagiran, B., Retnawati, H., & Hassan, A. (2022). Habituation of Mathematical Literacy Trained in Junior High School. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 8(2), 321–330.

Santi, E., Kholipa, R., Putri, M. G., & Mujiono. (2021). Reading Interest Strength and Vocabulary Acquisition of EFL Learners: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 17(3), 1225–1242. https://doi.org/10.52462/jlls.87

Santo-Tomás Muro, R., Granados, C. S. de T., & Rodríguez Romero, E. J. (2020). Green Infrastructures in the Peri-Urban Landscape: Exploring Local Perception of Well-Being Through “Go-Alongs” and “Semi-Structured Interviews.” Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(17), 6836. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU12176836

Smith, M., Chambers, S., Campbell, A., Pierce, T., McCarthy, T., & Kostewicz, D. E. (2020). Use of Routine-Based Instruction to Develop Object Perception Skills with Students Who Have Visual Impairments and Severe Intellectual Disabilities: Two Case Studies. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 114(2), 101–113.

Sparapani, N., Solari, E., Towers, L., McIntyre, N., Henry, A., & Zajic, M. (2020). Secondary Analysis of Reading-Based Activities Utilizing a Scripted Language Approach: Evaluating Interactions Between Students with Autism and Their Interventionists. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 63(9), 3130–3154. https://doi.org/10.1044/2020_JSLHR-19-00146

Striepe, M. (2021). Combining Concept Mapping with Semi-Structured Interviews: Adding Another Dimension to the Research Process. International Journal of Research and Method in Education, 44(5), 519–532. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2020.1841746

Syamsuri, A. S., & Bancong, H. (2022). Do Gender and Regional Differences Affect Students’ Reading Literacy? A Case Study in Indonesia. Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 8(1), 97–1110. https://doi.org/10.32601/ejal.911522

Sysoev, I., Gray, J. H., Fine, S., Makini, S. P., & Roy, D. (2022). Child-Driven, Machine-Guided: Automatic Scaffolding of Constructionist-Inspired Early Literacy Play. Computers and Education, 182, 104434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104434

Tomaszewski, L. E., Zarestky, J., & Gonzalez, E. (2020). Planning Qualitative Research: Design and Decision Making for New Researchers. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 19, 1609406920967174. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406920967174

Wolthuis, F., Hubers, M. D., van Veen, K., & de Vries, S. (2022). The Concept of Organizational Routines and Its Potential for Investigating Educational Initiatives in Practice: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Review of Educational Research, 92(2), 249–287.

Downloads

Published

2023-12-29

How to Cite

Faizatul Widat, Uswatun Hasanah, & Arini Izzatin Nabila. (2023). Fostering Grade 3 Students’ Reading Interest: The One Day One Reading Literacy Movement . Educazione: Journal of Education and Learning, 1(1), 13–24. https://doi.org/10.61987/educazione.v1i1.495