Peer Review Process

Editorial Workflow

Peer Review Process

All manuscripts submitted to Educazione: Journal of Education and Learning must follow the focus, scope, and author guidelines of this journal, and address scientific merit or novelty appropriate to the focus and scope. Every manuscript must be free from plagiarism; authors are encouraged to run a similarity check before submission, and editors verify originality using plagiarism-detection software.

2+ Expert Reviewers Double-Blind Review ~2 Months Decision
How It Works
  1. 1

    Submission & Initial Check

    Manuscripts are screened for scope, scientific merit, and originality through plagiarism detection.

  2. 2

    Double-Blind Peer Review

    Each article is reviewed by at least two expert reviewers under a double-blind process, treated confidentially before publication.

  3. 3

    Revision

    Reviewers provide valuable scientific comments. If revision is invited, the corresponding author should return the revised manuscript within two weeks.

  4. 4

    Final Decision

    Principal Editors make the final decision based on reviewers’ comments. Authors can expect a decision, or an explanation for any delay, within two months of receipt.

Publication of accepted articles — including the sequence of publication — is determined by the Editor-in-Chief, considering the accepted date, geographical distribution of authors, and the thematic issue.