Integrating Pragmatics into English Language Teaching: Challenges and Opportunities
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61987/educazione.v1i1.2840Keywords:
Pragmatic Competence, English Language Teaching, Instructed Pragmatics, Communicative CompetenceAbstract
Pragmatic competence has become an essential component of communicative competence in English language teaching (ELT), yet its integration into English as a Foreign Language (EFL) classrooms remains limited. This study investigates how English teachers integrate pragmatics into classroom instruction, the challenges they encounter, and the opportunities that support pragmatic instruction in Indonesian EFL contexts. Employing a qualitative descriptive design, the study involved eight English teachers from two public senior high schools in Panyabungan, North Sumatra, Indonesia, selected through purposive sampling. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews and supporting teaching documents and analyzed using Braun and Clarke's thematic analysis. The findings revealed three major themes. First, teachers integrated pragmatics through explicit instruction of speech acts, contextual role-play, authentic audiovisual materials, and discussions of pragmatic failure. Second, teachers encountered several pedagogical and contextual challenges, including limited pragmatic content in textbooks, difficulties in assessing pragmatic competence, insufficient confidence in teaching culturally embedded meanings, first-language interference, limited exposure to authentic English communication, and examination-oriented learning. Third, several opportunities facilitated pragmatic instruction, including digital technology, the flexibility of the Merdeka Curriculum, the integration of Mandailing cultural values, and collaboration through the English Teachers' Working Group (MGMP). The study concludes that although pragmatic instruction remains constrained by various structural factors, Indonesian EFL teachers demonstrate considerable pedagogical creativity in promoting communicative competence. The findings highlight the importance of strengthening teacher professional development, improving instructional materials, and incorporating pragmatic competence more systematically into English language curricula and assessment.
References
Bardovi-Harlig, K. (1996). Pragmatics and Language Teaching: Bringing Pragmatics and Pedagogy Together. In L. F. Bouton (Ed.), Pragmatics and Language Learning (Vol. 7, pp. 21–39). University of Illinois.
Bardovi-Harlig, K. (1999). Exploring the Interlanguage of Interlanguage Pragmatics: A Research Agenda for Acquisitional Pragmatics. Language Learning, 49(4), 677–713. https://doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.00105
Bardovi-Harlig, K. (2001). Evaluating the Empirical Evidence: Grounds for Instruction in Pragmatics? In K. R. Rose & G. Kasper (Eds.), Pragmatics in Language Teaching (pp. 13–32). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524797.005
Borg, S. (2006). Teacher Cognition and Language Education: Research and Practice. Continuum.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813085
Canale, M., & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical Bases of Communicative Approaches to Second Language Teaching and Testing. Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 1–47. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/I.1.1
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Haugh, M., Chang, W. L. M., & Kádár, D. Z. (Eds.). (2023). The Cambridge Handbook of Sociopragmatics. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108954105
Johnson, K. E. (2009). Second Language Teacher Education. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203878033
Kasper, G., & Dahl, M. (1991). Research Methods in Interlanguage Pragmatics. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 13(2), 215–247. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100009955
Kasper, G., & Rose, K. R. (2002). Pragmatic Development in a Second Language. Blackwell.
Lincoln, Y. S., Guba, E. G., & Pilotta, J. J. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 9(4), 438–439. https://doi.org/10.1016/0147-1767(85)90062-8
Locher, M. A., & Watts, R. J. (2005). Politeness Theory and Relational Work. Journal of Politeness Research, 1(1), 9–33. https://doi.org/10.1515/jplr.2005.1.1.9
Pojprasat, S., & Watcharapunyawong, S. (2022). Factors Affecting Teachers' Pragmatic Knowledge Incorporation into Thai EFL Classrooms. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 21(9), 197–216. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.21.9.11
Ren, W., & Han, Z. (2016). The Representation of Pragmatic Knowledge in Recent ELT Textbooks. ELT Journal, 70(4), 424–434. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccw010
Rose, K. R., & Kasper, G. (Eds.). (2001). Pragmatics in Language Teaching. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524797
Spencer-Oatey, H. (2008). Culturally Speaking: Culture, Communication and Politeness Theory (2nd ed.). Continuum.
Sykes, J. M. (2018). Digital Games and Language Teaching and Learning. Foreign Language Annals, 51(1), 219–224. https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12325
Taguchi, N. (2007). Task Difficulty in Oral Speech Act Production. Applied Linguistics, 28(1), 113–135. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/aml051
Taguchi, N. (2015). Instructed Pragmatics at a Glance: Where Instructional Studies Were, Are, and Should Be Going. Language Teaching, 48(1), 1–50. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444814000263
Thomas, J. (1983). Cross-Cultural Pragmatic Failure. Applied Linguistics, 4(2), 91–112. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/4.2.91
Vellenga, H. (2004). Learning Pragmatics from ESL & EFL Textbooks: How Likely? TESL-EJ, 8(2). https://tesl-ej.org/ej30/a3.html
Yule, G. (1996). Pragmatics. Oxford University Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Akhrif Yahsya

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
